What is the maximum Integermania exquisiteness of a set of $n$ values?
Theorem 2: In an Integermania problem where set $A$ has $n$ values, the level 1 exquisiteness of $A$ will be less than or equal to 1 when $n=1$, and less than or equal to 3 when $n=2$. See proof below.
Comments: The maximum exquisiteness of larger sets is unknown. However, $\operatorname{Exq}(\{1,2,4\}) = 10$, and $\operatorname{Exq}(\{2,3,4,22\}) = 52$, so these are lower bounds to the maximums.
Proof: A singleton set does not use binary operations, and hence can only produce itself. Therefore, if $a=1$, then $\operatorname{Exq}(A) = 1$, otherwise $\operatorname{Exq}(A) = 0$.
If $A = \{1,2\}$, then $\operatorname{Exq}(A) = 3$. The theorem claims that this set reaches maximum exquisiteness, although this is not the only doubleton set with exquisiteness 3.
Doubleton sets $A = \{a,b\}$ will use exactly one of the four available binary operations. Addition and multiplication are commutative. Subtraction and division will each produce at most one positive integer. Therefore, $\operatorname{Exq}(A) \le 4$.
Let us assume that $\operatorname{Exq}(A) = 4$, and find a contradiction. We expect to find values $a$ and $b$ for which the sum, difference, product, and quotient give the numbers 1, 2, 3, and 4 (but not necessarily in that order).
So both values $a$ and $b$ must be positive, and not equal to one another.
Since the values must be different, let us assume that $a < b$. Since both $b+a$ and $b-a$ must be positive integers, we can add and subtract these to find that $2b$ and $2a$ are both positive integers, therefore $a$ and $b$ are both multiples of one-half. If both were odd multiples, then multiplication would not produce a positive integer. If exactly one was an odd multiple, then addition would not produce a positive integer. Therefore, both must themselves be positive integers (even multiples of one-half).
If $a=1$ (the smallest positive integer), then multiplication and division would produce the same positive integer. Therefore, $a \ge 2$ and $b \ge 3$. But this implies a sum of at least 5, too large to obtain $\operatorname{Exq}(A) = 4$ with just four operations. Therefore, $\operatorname{Exq}(A) \le 3$.
Back to Theorems and Conjectures.